Gradyszewski v. Detroit United Railway
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Murfin, J. Case by John Gradyszewski, Jr., by his next friend, against the Detroit United Railway for personal injuries. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
Plaintiff, a boy seven years and five months of age at the time of his injury, was proceeding southerly along the east side of St. Aubin avenue in the city of Detroit. He desired to cross Forest avenue, upon which defendant operates a double-track electric line. The paved portion of Forest at this point is 40 feet wide. The distance from the north curb on Forest avenue to north rail of defendant’s tracks is 12.65 feet. As plaintiff left the curb and started to cross the street, he saw one of defendant’s cars approaching from the east. The car was then a little east of the alley, which is 100…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fritz v. Detroit Citizens' Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Merritt v. FooteMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Coessens v. Rapid RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Stenzhorn v. City Electric Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Rollo v. City Electric Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gross v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1914
- Hering v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Weitzel v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1915