Legal Opinion

Ahearn v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 2, 1925No. 4328PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

This is a writ of error to review a judgment of conviction under the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 10138% et seq.). The information names two defendants and. contains three counts. The first count charges the sale of one gallon of whisky; the second count, the sale of 15 gallons of whisky; and the third count, the transportation of 15 gallons of whisky — all on the 8th day of November, 1922.

The plaintiff in error D. J. Aheam entered a plea of guilty as to counts 1 and 3, and not guilty as to count 2. The plaintiff in error W. J. Aheam entered a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Hammer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  3. Reyff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gros v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
  2. Keen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  3. Keen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API