Legal Opinion

Fasulo v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1989No. 18244PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANSOM, Justice.

The Fasulos brought a declaratory judgment action against their insurance company, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, seeking a declaration that their State Farm policies gave them $75,-000 of underinsured motorist coverage as to each underinsured motorist whose concurrent negligence caused injury to Audra Fasulo. State Farm filed a motion to dismiss and the Fasulos filed a motion for summary judgment. After hearing arguments, the trial court granted State Farm’s motion to dismiss. The Fasulos have appealed. We affirm.

For purposes of a motion to dismiss…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. New Mexico Welding Supply, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Schmick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Wilson v. GaltNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Nikiper v. Motor Club of America Cos.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  5. Morro v. Farmers Insurance GroupNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bhasker v. Kemper Cas. Ins. Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
  2. Brunacini v. KavanaghNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Crutcher v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2021
  4. In Re PortalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Carlisle v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeColorado Court of Appeals · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API