Scott v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The appeal presents for review only the record proper. There is no bill of exceptions. The record is made up under Supreme Court rule No. 27, vol. 4, Code of 1923, p. 888; section 3249, Code. It fails to disclose that any of appellant’s mandatory rights were disregarded on the trial; or, if so, that he made objection to such rulings or action of the trial court.
The old rule under the Code of 1S96, § 4325, for making a transcript, prescribed that it “need not contain (1) mere orders of continuance, (2) nor the organization of the grand jury which found the indictment, (3) nor…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Roan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Morris v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Spooney v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Stinson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Vernon v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Seals v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Duck v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957
- Hollander v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.