Martin v. Reavis
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.
This is an action to recover from defendants, who are attorneys at law, $1,666.66, which it is alleged belongs to plaintiffs and is wrongfully withheld by defendants;' also to recover, as a penalty, thrice the amount retained, on the theory that it was procured by deceit practiced by the defendants. Defendants admit the retention of the $1,666.66; assert that it was due them as attorney’s fees under a written contract of employment as attorneys for plaintiffs, and deny that any deceit was practiced. On a trial of the issues, after all the testimony was taken, a verdict was directed for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Meyer v. ShameNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Western Manufacturing Co. v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Clark v. HallNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Ricketts v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by8 opinions
- Olds v. JamisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
- Mecham v. ColbyNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
- Washington Heights Co. v. FrazierNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Elk City Cotton Oil Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Plummer v. FieNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.