Legal Opinion

(SS) Dean v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 11, 2020No. 1:18-cv-01564Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID GARRY DEAN, ) Case No.: Case No.: 1:18-cv-1564 - JLT ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER REMANDING THE ACTION PURSUANT ) TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) 13 v. ) ) ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF DAVID GARRY DEAN ) AGAINST DEFENDANT, THE COMMISSIONER 15 Defendant. ) OF SOCIAL SECURITY ) 16 17 David Garry Dean asserts he is entitled to benefits under the Social Security Act. Plaintiff 18 argues the administrative law judge erred in evaluating the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Jana M. Bayliss v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API