R. L. McDonald & Co. v. Cash & Hainds
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the Chariton Circuit Court. — Hon. G-. D. Burgess, Judge. (1) “Partnership creditors have a primary and exclusive claim upon the partnership assets of * * * insolvent partners.” Tenney v. Johnson, 43 N. H. 144; Phelps v. McNeeley, 66 Mo. 554; Flannegm v. Alexcmder, 50 Mo. 50; Ackley v. Staehlin, 56 Mo. 561; McDonald db Co. v. Cash db Hainds, 45 Mo. App. 66; In re Estate of Edwards dbWigginton, 47 Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Chariton Circuit Court. — Hon. G-. D. Burgess, Judge. (1) “Partnership creditors have a primary and exclusive claim upon the partnership assets of * * * insolvent partners.” Tenney v. Johnson, 43 N. H. 144; Phelps v. McNeeley, 66 Mo. 554; Flannegm v. Alexcmder, 50 Mo. 50; Ackley v. Staehlin, 56 Mo. 561; McDonald db Co. v. Cash db Hainds, 45 Mo. App. 66; In re Estate of Edwards dbWigginton, 47 Mo. App. 307; Beylurn v. Mitchell, 106 Mo. 365, 375, top 377; Murrill v. Neill, 8 How. (U. Í3.) 414, at close of opinion; Bowen v. Billings, 13 Neb. 439, loe. cit. 443; Bo op v. Herron,…
1Opinion of the CourtEllison, J.
— This action was begun against defendants Cash & Hainds, partners in the mercantile business. An attachment, in aid, was levied upon a stock of general merchandise as the property of defendants,- but which was in the possession of, and claimed by, the interpleader. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for interpleader.
The facts necessary to state for an understanding of the point we deem necessary to decide, are substantially these: Cash & Hainds were insolvent both as a firm and individually; that is to say, they were insolvent in the sense that their assets, liable to process of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Case v. BeauregardSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Fitzpatrick v. FlannaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Sexton v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Allen v. Center Valley Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1851
- Reyburn v. MitchellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sargent v. BlakeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Kelly-Goodfellow Shoe Co. v. Vail Bros.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1900
- Blasland - Parcels - Jordon Shoe Co. v. HicksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
- J. G. Hutchinson & Co. v. Morris Bros.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1900
- Freedman v. HolbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.