Martin v. Hubbard
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Brror from Haskell County Court; A. L. Beckett, Judge. Action by Mai. Hubbard against J. L. Martin. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SHARP, C.
Four errors are charged in the brief of plaintiff in error. The first is that the court erred in compelling the defendant to go to trial at the October term in the absence of his attorney, and after the jury for the term had been discharged.
From the case-made it appears that it was agreed by defendant’s attorney in open court that the action should be tried at the October term of the court, but that on the day assigned for trial the defendant’s attorney, on account of a previous engagement which fie could not postpone, could not fie present; that thereupon the defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Glaser v. GlaserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Coalgate Co. v. BrossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Saxon v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Stinchcomb v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Beall v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jones v. EpplerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Frey v. FailesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Benn v. TrobertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Greer v. MoormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Jordan v. MullendoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.