Legal Opinion

Olander Contracting Co. v. Gail Wachter Investments

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 2003No. 20020330PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] The City of Bismarck (“Bismarck”) appealed an amended judgment that, among other things, awarded Olander Contracting Co. (“Olander”) interest under the prompt payment statute, N.D.C.C. ch. 13-01.1. We conclude the addition of prompt payment interest was not available to Olander under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) after our decision in an earlier appeal became final. We reverse and remand for entry of judgment.

I

[¶ 2] Olander sued Gail Wachter Investments and Bismarck for damages for extra work it claimed it was required to perform to complete a water and sewer construction…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Walter L. Compton, Jr. v. Alton Steamship Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  2. Olander Contracting Co. v. Gail Wachter InvestmentsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Grinaker v. GrinakerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Gajewski v. BratcherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Kopp v. KoppNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Kukla v. KuklaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Hildebrand v. StolzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Laib v. LaibNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Meier v. MeierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API