Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 2005No. 20040293PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTRÓM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Michele Johnson appealed from a summary judgment dismissing her action for no-fault benefits against her motor vehicle insurer, Nodak Mutual Insurance Company, and from an order denying her motion for post-summary-judgment relief. We hold Johnsoh’s action is barred by the four-year statute of limitations in N.D.C.C. § 26.1411-19(1), and we affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Johnson was involved in separate automobile accidents in December 1996 and in February 1997. When the accidents occurred, Johnson had motor vehicle insurance, including basic no-fault benefits of $30,000, with Nodak…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. County of Stutsman v. State Historical Society of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Johnson v. HauglandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Diocese of Bismarck Trust v. Ramada, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Narum v. Faxx Foods, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Rummel v. RummelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. BertramNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Witzke v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Wheeler v. GardnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Kuperus v. WillsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Miller v. Diamond Resources, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API