Legal Opinion

In Re Mooney

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 9, 1918No. Crim. No. 709PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District to obtain the admission of petitioner to bail. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The defendant is restrained of her liberty under a bench warrant issued out of the superior court of the state of California in and for the city and county of San Francisco, upon eight separate indictments presented by the grand jury in cases entitled “People of the State of California v. Rena Mooney,” numbered 7530 to 7537, inclusive, wherein the defendant was charged with the murder of eight different persons. Upon one of these indictments only the defendant has been tried and acquitted by a jury. The record of that ease is before us, as are also the proceedings before the grand…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re TroiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Ex parte CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re NordinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Kilpatrick v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  3. Ramsay v. RodgersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. In Re NordinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. In the Matter of WeinbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API