Legal Opinion

David v. Oakland Home Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1895No. 1526PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, C. J.

This action was brought to recover for loss of property covered by an insurance policy issued by the defendant. There was a clause in the policy which provided that no action could be maintained thereon unless commenced within six months from the date of the fire. On account of this provision, and of the fact that suit was not commenced until more than six months from the date of the fire, it is claimed by the appellant that the action cannot be maintained; and upon that claim alone it seeks to have the judgment rendered in the court below…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Hopkins v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Supreme Tribe of Ben-Hur v. YorkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  4. Fischer v. Harmony Town InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Shaw Supply Co. v. Charles Nelson Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API