Legal Opinion

State v. Bauer

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 12, 1985No. 84-1340-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCane, P.J.

The state appeals an order suppressing the identification of Daniel J. Bauer as the perpetrator of a sexual assault. The victim of the assault identified Bauer at the preliminary hearing. The in-court identification followed prior identifications from a photo array and a physical lineup. After the victim died in an automobile accident, the defendant sought to suppress the in-court identification because the state could not produce the photo array or a photograph of the lineup. The trial court concluded that the lost photographs were material evidence and that due process prohibits the state…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. ArmstrongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grady v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. RuffinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
  3. State v. BauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Grady v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API