Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ellison v. Skelly Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 24, 1951No. 33763Published

1DissentO’Neal, J.

My understanding of the law, in the situation disclosed by the facts in this case, does not admit of my concurrence in the majority opinion. I think the rule enunciated in Oldfield v. Gypsy Oil & Gas Co., 123 Okla. 293, 252 P. 298; Brazell v. Soucek, 130 Okla. 204, 266 P. 442; Brunson v. Carter Oil Co., 259 F. 656, and Brunson v. Carter Oil Co., 263 F. 935, is a salutary rule, and, under the facts, this case is well within the rule.

I think the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. Here the owners of the lease had manifested an unequivocal intention to keep the lease alive, and had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brunson v. Carter Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Oldfield v. Gypsy Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Brazell v. SoucekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Brunson v. Carter Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API