Legal Opinion

Meriwether v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 18, 1932No. 21397PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) By the written terms of the agreement the company promised to pay only the executor or administrator of the insured; in other words, the estate of the insured was the designated beneficiary. In such a case, the general rule is that even a sole heir at law can not maintain suit upon the policy, although it may be alleged that the estate owed no debts and there was no administration. Brown v. Mutual Life Insurance Co., 146 Ga. 123 (90 S. E. 856). In the present case there was a provision usually termed a “facility of payment” clause, providing that the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Ætna InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Clay v. Phœnix InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Corporation of the Royal Exchange Assurance v. FranklinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  4. New York Life Insurance v. PattenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  5. Athens Mutual Insurance v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nowell v. Mayor of MonroeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  2. Newark Fire Insurance v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  3. United States v. ChavezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  4. McDonald v. Afro-American Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Self v. American National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API