Legal Opinion

Novak v. Penzone

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 10, 2019No. 1 CA-CV 19-0129Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE DAVID NOVAK, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. PAUL PENZONE, et al., Defendants/Appellees. No. 1 CA-CV 19-0129 FILED 12-10-2019 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CV2017-055923 The Honorable Theodore Campagnolo, Judge AFFIRMED COUNSEL David Novak, Fountain Hills Plaintiff/Appellant Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix By Christine B. Stutz Counsel for Defendants/Appellees…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. CarverArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Florez v. SargeantArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Mangum v. HargettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  5. Frank Michael Kendrick v. Peter Carlson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API