Legal Opinion

State v. . Huntley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1843PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On the trial it was insisted by the defendant's counsel, and the Judge was required so to instruct the jury, that if the facts charged in the indictment were all true, they nevertheless constituted in law no offense of which they could find the defendant guilty. His Honor refused this prayer, and instructed the jury that if the facts charged were proved to their satisfaction, it was their duty to find him guilty. The same ground of defense has been taken here by way of a motion in arrest of judgment; but we are of opinion that in whatever form presented, it is not tenable.

The argument is,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . McNairSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. State v. . LanierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  3. State v. . RotenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  4. State v. . NortonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. D.J. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Matter of DrakefordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  3. In Re MayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. DJ v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API