Legal Opinion

Lathrop v. Juneau & Associates, Inc. P.C.

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided February 11, 2004No. 03-CV-0194-DRHPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HERNDON, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Before the Court is the motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint submitted by Dan Brown, Ronald Selph, Mark Spengler and the City of Granite City, Illinois (Doe. 11,15). Pro se Plaintiff Stephen Lathrop is a contractor who apparently had a construction project approved by Granite City’s Aldermen and has brought a claim alleging that Defendants wrongfully prevented the completion of his agreement because it would have interfered with another construction project in which all named Defendants had a legal or illegal interest.

*332II. Background

P…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hirsch v. City of N.Y.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Edwards v. City of HenryAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  3. Brewer v. Village of Old FieldDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
  4. LaFlamboy v. LandekDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
  5. Curtis v. WilksDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API