Legal Opinion
Princeton University Press, MacMillan Inc., and St. Martin's Press, Inc. v. Michigan Document Services, Inc., and James M. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 8, 1996No. 94-1778Published
1Opinion of the Court
99 F.3d 1381
65 USLW 2324, 1997 Copr.L.Dec. P 27,579,
114 Ed. Law Rep. 34,
40 U.S.P.Q.2d 1641
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS, Macmillan, Inc., and St.
Martin's Press, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
MICHIGAN DOCUMENT SERVICES, INC., and James M. Smith,
Defendants-Appellants.
No. 94-1778.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.
Reargued June 12, 1996.
Decided Nov. 8, 1996.
J. Michael Huget, James E. Stewart, Butzel Long, Detroit, MI, Ronald S. Rauchberg (reargued and rebriefed), Herman L. Goldsmith, Proskauer, Rose, Goetz & Mendelsohn, New York City, for Princeton University Press.
J. Michael Huget, Butzel…
Also in this document: Dissent · Merritt; Dissent · Ryan.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.