Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Shapiro v. Kurtzman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 22, 2006Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLifson, J.

(concurring in part and dissenting in part and voting to modify the order, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, by deleting the provision thereof granting the motion and substituting therefor a provision granting the motion unless discovery is completed within 60 days; and so modified, to affirm the order, direct that discovery be supervised by a referee appointed by the Supreme Court, Rockland County, and extend the time to comply until 60 days from the service of a copy of this decision and order): The parties to this appeal have a history of litigation related to the contributions…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pascarelli v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Jenkins v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Kuzmin v. Visiting Nurse ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Lombardo v. St. Francis Hospital Rehabilitation ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Calle v. Robert Champeau, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API