Legal Opinion

Calle v. Robert Champeau, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 21, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dollard, J.), dated June 8, 2004, as granted his separate cross motions to strike the answers of the defendants Robert Champeau, Inc., and Robert R. Champeau, only to the extent of directing those defen*536dants to provide outstanding discovery demanded by him and awarding an attorney’s fee and costs.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

Actions should be resolved on their merits whenever…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Morano v. Westchester Paving & Sealing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. 181 South Franklin Associates, Inc. v. Y&R Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Traina v. TaglientiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. 1523 Real Estate, Inc. v. East Atlantic Properties, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. DuMorne v. Kemel-PierreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Shapiro v. KurtzmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API