Dudding v. Hill
Illinois Supreme Court
This cause was heard before Denning, Judge, and a jury, at the May term, 1852, of the Jackson Circuit Court, and resulted in a verdict and judgment for the defendant in error. The facts will be found in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTreat, C. J.
This was an action of assumpsit for use and occupation, brought by Harriet Hill against Richard Dudding. The material facts in evidence were these. In September, 1844, T. B. Hill, the husband of the plaintiff, became seized in fee of lots five and six in block twelve, in the town of Murphysborough. In May, 1846, lot six was sold on execution against Hill, and bid in by Heiple, who assigned the certificate of purchase to Dudding. In August, 1846, lot five was sold under an execution against Hill, and bid off by Buesley, who assigned the certificate of purchase to Dudding. Dudding obtained a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. StewartNew York Supreme Court · 1810
- Hoffar v. DementCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1847
- Pott v. LesherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1795
3Cited by16 opinions
- Higgins v. HalliganIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Marr v. RayIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- McNair v. SchwartzIllinois Supreme Court · 1854
- Hadley v. MorrisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- Fender v. RogersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.