Legal Opinion

Fender v. Rogers

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 4, 1901PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Assumpsit, for use and occupation. Appeal from the County Court of Clay County; the Hon. John R. Bonney, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the February term, 1901.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Creighton

delivered the- opinion of the court.

This was an action commenced before a justice of the peace, by appellant against appellee, to recover for use and occupation of a village lot, on which was situate a small stable. From the judgment rendered by the justice the case was appealed to the County Court of Clay County, where "trial de novo was had, by jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment in favor of appellee..The action, is based on the second clause of section one of the landlord and tenant act, Chap. 80, Starr & Curtis’ Statutes. The statute provides that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dudding v. HillIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Oakes v. OakesIllinois Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Rose v. DayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886
  4. Sanborn v. Haynes, Gordon & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1887

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sheppard v. Coeur d'Alene Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Pacific States Corporation v. ArnoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  3. Sianis v. KettlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. Jackson v. ReeterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915
  5. Leyson v. DavenportMontana Supreme Court · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API