Legal Opinion

Bolton v. Doe

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 11, 1976No. 20189Published

1Opinion of the Court

266 S.C. 344 (1976)

223 S.E.2d 187

Booker T. BOLTON, Jr., Appellant,

v.

John DOE, Respondent.

20189

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

March 11, 1976.

J. Frank Hartman, Esq., of Columbia, for Appellant.

Messrs. Rogers, McDonald, McKenzie & Fuller, of Columbia, for Respondent.

March 11, 1976.

NESS, Justice:

Appellant seeks review of summary judgment entered in favor of the respondent. The lower court ruled that appellant was not entitled to coverage under the uninsured motorist provision of an automobile insurance policy due to his failure to comply with South Carolina Code § 46-750. 34 (1975 Cum. Supp.).…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coker Ex Rel. Estate of Coker v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
  2. Criterion Insurance v. HoffmannSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  3. Hotzel v. SimmonsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  4. McKay v. Highlands Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  5. Bolton v. DoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API