Legal Opinion
BAUTISTA GOMEZ
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2006No. ID 3528PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
23 I&N Dec. 893
(BIA 2006) Interim Decision #3528 In re Alma Esmeralda BAUTISTA GOMEZ, Respondent File A77 421 754 - San Francisco Decided March 23, 2006 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals The provision in
8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(3) (2005) that an applicant for cancellation of removal under section 240A(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b) (2000), must demonstrate statutory eligibility for that relief prior to the service of a notice to appear applies only to the continuous physical presence requirement…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- ORTEGA-CABRERABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2005
- CASTROBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
- GADDABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2003
3Cited by11 opinions
- Alberto Mendez-Garcia v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Jose Rodriguez-Avalos v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- ISIDROBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2012
- Jose Rodriguez-Avalos v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Acuna-Gamez v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.