P.S. v. T.W.

May, Judge.

P.S. appeals the trial court’s decision to place him on GPS monitoring following his violation of the protective order (“PO”) in place to protect T.W. from P.S. P.S. argues GPS monitoring is inappropriate for two reasons: (1) he was not on notice that GPS monitoring was a possible consequence of violating the PO; and (2) the evidence was insufficient to prove he violated the PO. We affirm.

Pacts and Procedural History

P.S. and T.W. are married and in the process of a divorce. They also own a business together. On July 21, 2016, T.W. filed a petition for an order of protection against…