Legal Opinion
Berndt v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Sales Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 6, 1986No. Nos. 85-1488, 85-1518PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MANSMANN, Circuit Judge.
In these cross-appeals1 after a jury verdict for the plaintiff in this case brought pursuant to Section VII of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., we are asked to review, inter alia, two issues which have not yet been squarely dealt with by our court: 1) whether the district court is required to re-examine the elements of the plaintiffs initial prima facie case in ruling upon post-trial motions; and 2) whether unemployment compensation payments should be eliminated from the total amount of damages subject to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Massarsky v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- John D. Starceski, at No. 94-3208 v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, at No. 94-3182Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Jaime Blum, Brij Kapur and James C. Spitsbergen, in 86-5349 v. Witco Chemical Corporation, in 86-5310Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Bruce Gilchrist v. Jim Slemons Imports, Inc., and Jim SlemonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Tunis Bros. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Sperling v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.