Legal Opinion

Hausmann v. Hope

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 4, 1886PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Jackson Circuit Court, Hon. Turner A. Gill, Judge. Statement of case by the conrt. On tke first day of August, 1881, tke firm of Steifel & Ney, doing business in Kansas City, were largely indebted to various creditors, among whom were tke Bank of Kansas City, tke Ankeuser-Busck Brewing Company, of St. Lonis, and the firm of Wallwork & Harris, of Louisville, Ky.

Read the full summary

Error to Jackson Circuit Court, Hon. Turner A. Gill, Judge. Statement of case by the conrt. On tke first day of August, 1881, tke firm of Steifel & Ney, doing business in Kansas City, were largely indebted to various creditors, among whom were tke Bank of Kansas City, tke Ankeuser-Busck Brewing Company, of St. Lonis, and the firm of Wallwork & Harris, of Louisville, Ky. On said day Steifel & Ney executed a deed of mortgage on their stock of goods, consisting of whiskey and tobacco, to the plaintiff, Hausmann, to secure the debts owing to said bank and brewing company. This deed was duly…

1Opinion of the CourtPhilips, P. J.

I. The plaintiff in error insists that the instrument of conveyance by which Steifel & Ney conveyed the goods to Ilausmann, was in effect, a deed of assignment, and we are asked to so hold, in the event we should be of opinion that it was not so fraudulent as1 to other creditors as to wholly avoid its operation. And yet the defendants’ counsel has not attached so* much importance to this point as to have furnished the court with even the substance of the deed in the abstract of the record. This is not a compliance with rule fifteen of this court, and as heretofore held, we will not go to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. HardinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. Shelley v. BootheSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  3. Holmes v. BraidwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  4. Frisbee v. LangworthyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  5. State ex rel. Pace v. McCormackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hellman & Co. v. Pollock & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Voelker v. Hill-O'Meara Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Halderman v. StillingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. First National Bank v. JaffraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  5. Ottumwa National Bank v. TottenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API