Legal Opinion

Southeastern Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Berrie

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 1943No. 6 Div. 943PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICE, Judge.

This is an appeal by the Southeastern Greyhound Lines, a corporation, the defendant below, from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Jefferson County in favor of the plaintiff.

The complaint was in tort for damages, seeking recovery of the value of a purse and its contents.

There were two counts in the complaint, both of which set up the fact that defendant was a common carrier of passengers and plaintiff a passenger for hire.

Count 1 then charged that defendant “failed to use reasonable care to protect plaintiff’s baggage” and as a proximate consequence thereof the baggage was lost.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Diel v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. McCarty v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Kravitz v. Parking Service Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. R. L. Cooper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clott v. GREYHOUND LINES, INCORPORATEDSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Harrelson v. JacksonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API