Legal Opinion

Wentzville Public School District v. Paulson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 8, 1985No. 50030PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

Defendant, Joseph Paulson, a non-resident school teacher employed by plaintiff, Wentzville Public School District (Wentz-ville District), applied to have his non-resident child enrolled in Wentzville’s school. Section 167.151, RSMo.Supp. 1984 allows the school board, in its discretion, to admit non-resident school pupils and “prescribe the tuition fee to be paid by them.” Wentzville District was willing to accept defendant’s child as a student. However, Section 168.151, RSMo. 1978, prohibits the school board from receiving “any money from any teacher employed by their district…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Glick Ex Rel. McGinty v. Allstate Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Knopke v. KnopkeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Moschenross v. St. Louis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Molasky v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Renick v. City of Maryland HeightsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Fulson v. Kansas City Star Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Jines v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API