Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. George

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 21, 2017No. SJC 12173PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

After a jury trial in the Superior Court, the defendant, Richard George, was determined to be a sexually dangerous person (SDP) pursuant to G. L. c. 123A. In accordance with the statute, the judge committed the defendant to the Massachusetts Treatment Center (treatment center) for an indeterminate period of from one day to life. The defendant hied a timely appeal challenging the commitment on the grounds that (1) a diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) is a constitutionally inadequate basis for commitment as an SDP; and (2) the judge erroneously admitted expert opinion testimony…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. FlebotteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  3. Simon v. SolomonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. BrunoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  5. State v. Donald DD.New York Court of Appeals · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re R.B.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  2. Commonwealth v. BradshawMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  3. Commonwealth v. CurlewMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
  4. Commonwealth v. SpringMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  5. Commonwealth v. TiruMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API