Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Spring

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 24, 2018No. AC 17-P-1194Published

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

Following a jury trial, the defendant, Robert Kenneth Spring, Jr., was found to *409 be a sexually dangerous person (SDP). See G. L. c. 123A, §§ 12, 14. The evidence at trial established that he had a history of both contact and noncontact sex offenses, and the jury were asked to determine whether the defendant would commit either kind of sex offense in the future. This case calls upon us to address, in the context of a motion for new trial claiming ineffective assistance of counsel, what instruction the jury should have been given regarding whether the defendant was likely to reoffend in such a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. SaferianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. In re the Detention of ThorellWashington Supreme Court · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API