Broome v. Bi-State Development Agency
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GRIMM, Judge.
In this jury tried case, plaintiff Eunice Broome obtained a verdict against defendants Bi-State Development Agency and Grady Alexander. Defendants’ after-trial motion sought a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, alternatively, a new trial.
The trial court denied the JNOV but granted the motion for new trial. In sustaining the new trial motion, the trial court specified three grounds for its action. Those grounds are (1) erroneous admission of evidence, (2) error in giving plaintiff’s verdict directing instruction, and (3) error in giving plaintiff’s definition of right-of-way…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bayne v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- State v. FlemingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
- Ayres v. KeithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- State Ex Rel. Berberich v. HaidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Galovich v. Hertz CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gail & Darrell Mansfield v. Caleb Horner & John HornerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. HuttonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Anuhco, Inc. v. Westinghouse Credit Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Austin v. KruseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Billy R. Richey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016