Legal Opinion

Waginer Mfg. Co. v. Cutler-Hammer, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 8, 1950No. Civ. No. 992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEVIN, Chief Judge.

On or about November 21 and 22, 1949, plaintiff served defendant with notices to take oral depositions of various officers and employees of the defendant “and perhaps others” at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, on November 29 and 30, 1949. On November 22, 1949, subpoenas duces tecum were issued and served.

On November 25, 1949, defendant filed a motion, pursuant to Rule 45 (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., so it asserts, in the United States District Court at Milwaukee, to Quash, Limit and Restrict the subpoenas duces tecum. The foregoing motion came on for…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Struthers Scientific & International Corp. v. General Foods Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1968
  2. Farnum v. Bristol-Myers Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
  3. International Nickel Co. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API