Legal Opinion

Farnum v. Bristol-Myers Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 29, 1966No. 5425PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

This transfer in advance of trial consolidates two reserved cases arising out of an action to recover damages for skin rashes or dermatitis suffered by the plaintiff, allegedly as a result of the use of a deodorant known as Ban, manufactured and marketed by the defendant, which she purchased in Tilton on April 17, 1957. One count of the writ alleges breach of warranty, and the other negligence in manufacture.

The plaintiff filed twenty-one interrogatories under Superior Court Rule 29. Certain of these were voluntarily answered by the defendant. As to the remainder, the Superior Court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Florence Wright and Roy Wright v. Carter Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  2. Glick v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1950
  3. Chemical & Industrial Corp. v. DruffelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
  4. Melori Shoe Corp. v. Pierce & Stevens, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1953
  5. Bleacher v. Bristol-Myers CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Amway Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
  2. Calderwood v. CalderwoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  3. Chicago Cutlery Co. v. DISTRICT COURT, ETC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  4. Sawyer v. BouffordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  5. Kearsarge Computer, Inc. v. Acme Staple Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API