Legal Opinion

Bischoff v. Newby's Tire Service

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 24, 1958No. Civ. 17685PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Fred B.), J.

Plaintiff drove his ear to defendants’ tire shop, removed one of the wheels and took it and a spare tire into the shop for a tire change. Defendant Fred Lowery removed the old tire and was installing the spare when the head of the hammer he was using flew off and hit plaintiff in the face. Verdict and judgment were for defendants.

Plaintiff’s principal claim upon this appeal is the failure of the trial court to give his requested instructions on res ipsa loquitur. Our examination of the record convinces us there was sufficient evidentiary basis for the giving of instructions…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Dierman v. Providence HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shahinian v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Khanoyan v. All American Sports Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. McCormack v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Tallerico v. Labor Temple Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Lyle v. Disneyland, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API