Legal Opinion

People v. Haycraft

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 4, 2004No. 5-02-0636PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hopkins

Following a stipulated bench trial, the defendant, Scott A. Hay-craft, was convicted of criminal drug conspiracy and unlawful manufacture of a controlled substance. The trial court sentenced the defendant to concurrent prison terms of 19 years for each conviction.

On appeal, the defendant argues that the search of his home was unconstitutional, that he was denied due process during his stipulated bench trial, that the State failed to prove he possessed more than 900 grams of methamphetamine, that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel, that his conviction for criminal drug…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. McCartyIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. WardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. People v. FortAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. People v. FortAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  5. People v. HumphreyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API