Legal Opinion

Tillman v. C.R. Bard, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided March 13, 2014No. 3:13-cv-222-J-34JBTPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JOEL B. TOOMEY, United States Magistrate Judge.

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the following:

*6621. Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order Regarding Confidential Document Designations (“Motion for Protective Order”) (Doc. 38) and Plaintiffs Amended Response thereto (Doe. 53); and

2. Defendants’ Motion for Leave to Submit Documents for In Camera Inspection (“Motion for In Camera Review”) (Doc. 37) and Plaintiffs Response thereto (Doc. 54).

For the reasons that follow, the Motion for Protective Order is due to be GRANTED and the Motion for In Camera Review is due to be DENIED as moot.

I.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Michael D. Van Etten v. Bridgestone/Firestone, IncCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  3. Richard A. Farnsworth v. The Procter & Gamble Company v. Center for Disease Control, Movant/appelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  4. In Re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, (Esm-1). Appeal of News and Sun-Sentinel Co. And John EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  5. Pescia v. Auburn Ford-Lincoln Mercury Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blevins v. Youth Villages, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API