Legal Opinion

McClendon v. Hollis

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 1, 2000No. 2991311PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YATES, Judge.

These parties have previously been before this court. See McClendon v. Hollis, 730 So.2d 229 (Ala.Civ.App.1998) (“McClendon /”).

Barbara McClendon sued Gustava Hollis on June 18, 1999, seeking certain declaratory and injunctive relief, alleging that Hollis had placed a drainage ditch and pipe across an easement that she used for a driveway to provide ingress to and egress from her property. On July 19,1999, Hollis moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing, among other things, that the action was barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Hollis also answered the complaint on that same…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Bussey v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Equity Resources Management, Inc. v. VinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Scannelly, 1100226 (Ala. 6-30-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  2. Watkins v. HarperCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API