Legal Opinion

Starling v. Florida Parole Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 19, 2007No. 1D06-4549PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

959 So.2d 753 (2007)

Kenneth Lee STARLING, Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Appellee.

No. 1D06-4549.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 19, 2007.

Kenneth Lee Starling, pro se, Appellant.

Kim Fluharty, General Counsel, and Anthony Andrews, Assistant General, Counsel, Florida Parole Commission, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

2Per curiam

The circuit court's order denying Kenneth Lee Starling's petition for writ of habeas corpus on the grounds that he should have sought relief by filing a petition for writ of mandamus is REVERSED. Richardson v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 924 So.2d 908, 910 (Fla.…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richardson v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  2. Pro-Art Dental Lab v. V-Strategic GroupDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  3. King v. Florida Parole CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ortiz v. Florida Parole CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  2. Pro-Art Dental Lab v. V-Strategic GroupDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API