Legal Opinion
Ortiz v. Florida Parole Commission
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 12, 2009No. 3D08-2484PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCope, J.
The question before us is whether the Florida Parole Commission 1 had the authority to impose a curfew as a condition of conditional release, where the underlying crimes were committed in 1990. We conclude that the answer is yes.
Rodolfo G. Ortiz entered a guilty plea to the offense of robbery in Miami-Dade County Circuit Court case number 90-6933, as well as robbery, kidnapping, and other charges in Miami-Dade County Circuit Court case number 90-13954 (collectively “the 1990 cases”). The crime dates were February and January, 1990, respectively. Defendant-petitioner Ortiz was sentenced to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sheley v. Florida Parole Com'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Duncan v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- State ex rel. Sarasota County v. BoyerSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Richardson v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Grace v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Millennium Diagnostic Imaging Center, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Velez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Drago v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2022