Legal Opinion

Enameled Metals Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided January 14, 1932No. Docket No. 19011Published

1Opinion of the Court

ENAMELED METALS COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Enameled Metals Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 19011.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

25 B.T.A. 186; 1932 BTA LEXIS 1566;

January 14, 1932, Promulgated

S. Leo Ruslander, Esq., for the petitioner.

P. S. Crewe, Esq., for the respondent.

GOODRICH

The Commissioner determined a deficiency in income and profits taxes for the year 1918 in the amount of $66,920.09, which was asserted as a jeopardy assessment. Against this assessment petitioner filed a claim in abatement, without bond, which was allowed in the amount of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Lorie v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1930
  3. Enameled Metals Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API