Legal Opinion

Philip Crosby v. Cooper B-Line, Incorporated

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 7, 2013No. 13-1054PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD, Circuit Judge.

The Supreme Court has held that Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 185, preempts all state-law claims that require the interpretation of a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) or any other covered labor contract. This rule, which goes under the clumsy name of “complete preemption” (a better term might be “complete displacement”), covers not only obvious disputes over labor contracts, but also any claim masquerading as a state-law claim that nevertheless is deemed “really” to be a claim under a labor contract. These cases are understood…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Bruce Betzner v. Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  2. Steven Olson v. Bemis Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  3. Boogaard v. National Hockey LeagueDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  4. Nelson ex rel. Estate of Boogaard v. National Hockey LeagueDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
  5. Singer v. Reg'l Transp. Auth. & Pace Suburban Bus Serv.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API