Legal Opinion

Anchor Concrete Products, Inc. v. Roetzer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 20, 1954Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur, except Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal and for granting the motion in the following memorandum: We think the complaint intermingles three causes of action: one for damages for breach of contract, another to set aside a fraudulent conveyance, and a third to enforce the trust fund provisions of section 13 of the Lien Law. Since the proof under the various causes of action is “ unrelated and would necessarily differ and concern different parties,” defendants’ motion to separately state and number should…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. v. ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. State of Rio De Janeiro v. E. H. Rollins & Sons, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Lyon v. IsraelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API