Legal Opinion
In re Deters
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 8, 1975No. 74-627PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 1 and 2, the only claims remaining in application serial No. 849,686, filed August 13, 1969. We affirm.
THE INVENTION
The invention relates to apparatus for cutting clay drain tile from a continuously extruded blank of wet, green clay by passing a wire through the blank at regular intervals. The improvement to which appellant’s claims are directed lies in causing the cutting wire to move in an undulating path as it passes through the blank, producing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Application of Virgil W. Vogel and Paul W. VogelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Application of Max O. RobesonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Application of Sigurd I. LindellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Application of Myron Pantzer and Milton FeierCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- In re SwettCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Union Carbide Corporation v. American Can CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Sundance, Inc. v. DeMonte Fabricating Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Union Carbide Corp. v. American Can Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- Transco Products Inc. v. Performance Contracting, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- In re Parameswar SivaramakrishnanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982