Legal Opinion
Easley v. Murray Hill Operating Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 4, 1946PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.
Motion for injunction is denied. It is axiomatic that one who seeks an injunction must show that he is possessed of some legal right, which is threatened, or has been, or is about to be, destroyed or invaded, and that he has a maintainable cause of action in that regard which requires the intervention and protection of a court of equity to make the right enforcible and effective.
The defendant Murray Hill Operating Co., Inc., is the owner in fee of premises Nos. 110-112 Park Avenue, Manhattan, known as the Murray Hill Hotel; it acquired the fee title thereto on April 30, 1943, at which time…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wilson v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
- Taylor v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944
- 431 Fifth Ave. Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
3Cited by3 opinions
- Turf Screen Printers, Inc. v. GrayNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Brause v. ParisiAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1948
- Easley v. Murray Hill Operating Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947