Legal Opinion
Acosta v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 17, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-1578PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.
Pro se Plaintiff Samuel Acosta, a federal prisoner in Texas, brought this action under the Freedom of Information Act, seeking documents and records about himself from a passel of governmental entities: the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Treasury, the Department of Justice, DOJ’s Criminal Division, the Executive Office of United States Attorneys, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the United States…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carl Oglesby v. The United States Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Hidalgo v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- James Ryan v. Lloyd Bentsen, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Jean-Pierre v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ayuda, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Pinson v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Pinson v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Competitive Enterprise Institute v. National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Pinson v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.