Legal Opinion
Langford v. Chrysler Motors Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 18, 1974No. 72-C-1284PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum of Decision
COSTANTINO, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Francis J. Langford, on behalf of himself and his infant son Frank, seeks to recover damages resulting from defendants’ breach of express and implied warranties emanáting from the sale of a Dodge Dart automobile. Chrysler Motors Corporation [hereinafter referred to as Chrysler] manufactured, designed and engineered the automobile, and Woodbridge Dodge, Inc. [hereinafter referred to as Woodbridge] sold the vehicle to plaintiff. Chrysler cross-claimed against Woodbridge seeking either indemnification or contribution, and also…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Codling v. PagliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Goldberg v. Kollsman Instrument Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Bolm v. Triumph Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Caiazzo v. VOLKSWAGENWERK, AGDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1979
- Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977