Legal Opinion

Coulter v. Norton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1894PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Jaclcson. (Lane, J., presiding.) Argued January 31, 1894. Decided May 22, 1894. Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

In December, 1891, Norton, Griffith & Co. were lessees of the Hurd House property at Jackson, and were making extensive alterations and improvements preparatory to-reopening the hotel. The improvements were completed about February 10, 1892, and the house opened for business. In December, 1891, said lessees sublet to plaintiff “ the ' cigar, and news room and stand in the hotel building now known as the cNew Hurd," being the first room immediately west of the main entrance to said hotel, and the appurtenances thereto, and the right of entrance, to and from the hotel rooms, for the purpose of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Denison v. FordNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1878
  2. Conlon v. McGrawMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fashion Fabrics of Iowa, Inc. v. Retail Investors Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  2. Blickley v. Luce's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Milligan v. HaggertyMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Wusthoff v. SchwartzWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Obermeier v. Mortgage Co. Holland-AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API