Legal Opinion
Cogdell v. Fort Worth National Bank
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 15, 1976No. 4868PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALTER, Justice.
Bill P. Cogdell filed suit against the Fort Worth National Bank, Trustee, and others for a declaratory judgment. The Bank’s motion for summary judgment sustaining its plea of privilege was granted and Cog-dell has appealed. We affirm.
The Bank’s plea was controverted by citing ten exceptions under Article 1995, Texas Revised Civil Statutes.
The federal statute (12 U.S.C.A. § 94) on venue against national banking association is as follows:
Ҥ 94. Venue of suits
Actions and proceedings against any association under this chapter may be had in any district or Territorial court of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Montclair v. RamsdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- James v. DryeTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Miller v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cogdell v. Fort Worth National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Stiba v. Bowers, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
- Cogdell v. Fort Worth National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- New Jersey Bank (N. A.) v. KnuckleyTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Allied Artists Pictures Corp. v. Transcontinental Theatres, Texas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.